Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

1996 Cagiva Mito MOT Pass Rate

Pass rate for Mito models manufactured in 1996, based on 57 real MOT test results.

61.4%
Pass Rate
38.6%
Fail Rate
57
Total Tests
22,083
Avg Mileage

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

1996 Cagiva Mito MOT Analysis

The 1996 Cagiva Mito has an MOT pass rate of 61.4% based on 57 tests — around the UK average for UK vehicles. Cars of this vintage present for MOT with an average of 22,083 miles on the odometer. With a 38.6% failure rate, the 1996 Mito is rated as "Average" for MOT reliability.

The leading cause of MOT failure for the 1996 Cagiva Mito is Motorcycle brakes, responsible for 7.0% of failures. Brake-related failures include worn brake pads, corroded brake discs, leaking brake lines, and faulty brake servos. These are safety-critical components — any brake deficiency will result in an MOT fail. Typical repair costs range from £150–400. Motorcycle drive system is the second most common issue at 1.8%.

⚠ Based on limited data (57 tests)

Top failures specific to 1996 models only. The overall Mito page may show different rankings.

What Fails Most

Motorcycle brakes 7.0%
Motorcycle drive system 1.8%

What Fails on This Car?

Click a category to see specific failure items.

View as table
MOT failure categories ranked by failure rate
RankFailure CategoryRate (%)Count
1Motorcycle Brakes7.0%4
2Motorcycle Drive System1.8%1

Failures per 10,000 Miles

avg. 22,083 mi

For every 10,000 miles driven, this shows what percentage of MOT tests fail for each category. This accounts for how far cars are actually driven, not just raw pass/fail counts.

Motorcycle brakes3.18% per 10K miMotorcycle drive system0.79% per 10K mi
View as table
Mileage-normalised failure rates by category
CategoryRate / 10K miRaw %Count
Motorcycle brakes3.187.0%4
Motorcycle drive system0.791.8%1

Mileage Statistics

22,083
Mean
18,939
Median
11,200
25th Percentile
25,680
75th Percentile
17.48% failures per 10K miles

Mileage-adjusted failure rate — accounts for how much this model year is typically driven.

About This Data

The 1996 Cagiva Mito has an MOT pass rate of 61.4% based on 57 tests — around the UK average for UK vehicles. Cars of this vintage present for MOT with an average of 22,083 miles on the odometer. With a 38.6% failure rate, the 1996 Mito is rated as "Average" for MOT reliability.

If you own or are considering buying a 1996 Cagiva Mito, budget for potential repairs before each MOT. Before your MOT, pay particular attention to motorcycle brakes: Listen for squealing or grinding noises. Check brake pedal feel — if it feels spongy or goes to the floor, have the system inspected immediately. Look at brake pad thickness through the wheel spokes (minimum 3mm). With relatively low average mileage of 22,083 miles, many of these vehicles are still in good mechanical condition.

Motorcycle brakes — 7.0% of failures

Motorcycle brakes issues account for 7.0% of MOT failures on 1996 Cagiva Mito models. Brake-related failures include worn brake pads, corroded brake discs, leaking brake lines, and faulty brake servos. These are safety-critical components — any brake deficiency will result in an MOT fail. Typical repair costs: £150–400. Pre-MOT check: Listen for squealing or grinding noises. Check brake pedal feel — if it feels spongy or goes to the floor, have the system inspected immediately. Look at brake pad thickness through the wheel spokes (minimum 3mm).

Motorcycle drive system — 1.8% of failures

Motorcycle drive system issues account for 1.8% of MOT failures on 1996 Cagiva Mito models. Motorcycle drive system issues are a common cause of MOT failure. Regular inspection and maintenance of these components helps ensure your vehicle passes its MOT. Typical repair costs: £100–400. Pre-MOT check: Have this system checked during regular servicing. Look for warning signs like unusual noises, vibrations, or dashboard warning lights.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue