Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

Norton Comando MOT Pass Rate

Overall pass rate across all manufacture years, based on 754 real MOT test results. Failure rate: 8.1%.

91.9%
Pass Rate
8.1%
Fail Rate
754
Total Tests
Motorcycle lighting and signalling
Top Failure

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Norton Comando MOT Reliability Overview

The Norton Comando is a rare vehicle in the UK, with 754 MOT test results recorded in our database spanning 6 manufacture years. It has an overall MOT pass rate of 91.9% and a failure rate of 8.1%, which is well above the UK average of approximately 37%.

Based on this data, the Norton Comando earns a "Excellent" reliability rating. The average Norton Comando presents for MOT with approximately 25,581 miles on the clock. Manufacture year matters: 1972 models achieve the highest pass rate at 96.9%, while 1976 models have the lowest at 85.2%. This 11.7 percentage point difference suggests notable variation in build quality or component durability across production years.

The most common MOT failure for the Norton Comando is Motorcycle lighting and signalling, affecting 5.4% of all tests. Motorcycle lighting and signalling issues are a common cause of MOT failure. Regular inspection and maintenance of these components helps ensure your vehicle passes its MOT. The second most common issue is Motorcycle brakes at 2.1%. Motorcycle drive system rounds out the top three at 1.2%. Together, these top 3 failure categories account for a significant portion of all MOT failures for this model.

Top failures across all manufacture years combined. Individual year pages may show different top failures.

What Fails Most

Motorcycle lighting and signalling 5.4%
Motorcycle brakes 2.1%
Motorcycle drive system 1.2%
⚖️ Compare

Best Year to Buy

📊
Insufficient data per manufacture year for this analysis

📈 How Each Vintage Ages

📈
Insufficient data per manufacture year for this analysis

Pass Rate by Manufacture Year

85.2%
Tests Avg Mileage 28,082Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling
90.9%
Tests Avg Mileage 29,818Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling
93.4%
Tests Avg Mileage 26,791Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling
87.9%
Tests Avg Mileage 35,578Top Failure Motorcycle brakes
96.9%
Tests Avg Mileage 18,906Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling
95.1%
Tests Avg Mileage 27,272Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling

* High Fail Rate badge indicates an MOT pass rate below 65% (failure rate above 35%).

What Fails on This Car?

Click a category to see specific failure items.

View as table
MOT failure categories ranked by failure rate
RankFailure CategoryRate (%)Count
1Motorcycle Lighting And Signalling5.8%44
2Motorcycle Brakes2.3%17
3Motorcycle Steering And Suspension1.3%10
4Motorcycle Tyres And Wheels1.3%10
5Motorcycle Drive System1.2%9
6Motorcycle Fuel And Exhaust0.4%3
7Motorcycle Reg Plates And Vin0.4%3
8Motorcycle Lamps And Reflectors0.3%2
9Motorcycle Structure And Attachments0.3%2
10Motorcycle Driving Controls0.3%2
11Motorcycle Body And Structure0.1%1

Failures per 10,000 Miles

avg. 25,581 mi

For every 10,000 miles driven, this shows what percentage of MOT tests fail for each category. This accounts for how far cars are actually driven, not just raw pass/fail counts.

Motorcycle lighting and signalling2.28% per 10K miMotorcycle brakes0.88% per 10K miMotorcycle steering and suspension0.52% per 10K miMotorcycle tyres and wheels0.52% per 10K miMotorcycle drive system0.47% per 10K miMotorcycle fuel and exhaust0.16% per 10K miMotorcycle reg plates and vin0.16% per 10K miMotorcycle lamps and reflectors0.10% per 10K miMotorcycle structure and attachments0.10% per 10K miMotorcycle driving controls0.10% per 10K miMotorcycle body and structure0.05% per 10K mi
View as table
Mileage-normalised failure rates by category
CategoryRate / 10K miRaw %Count
Motorcycle lighting and signalling2.285.8%44
Motorcycle brakes0.882.3%17
Motorcycle steering and suspension0.521.3%10
Motorcycle tyres and wheels0.521.3%10
Motorcycle drive system0.471.2%9
Motorcycle fuel and exhaust0.160.4%3
Motorcycle reg plates and vin0.160.4%3
Motorcycle lamps and reflectors0.100.3%2
Motorcycle structure and attachments0.100.3%2
Motorcycle driving controls0.100.3%2
Motorcycle body and structure0.050.1%1

🚗 Similar Cars to Consider

🚗
No comparable models

Mileage at MOT

25,581
Mean
25,565
Median
20,126
25th Percentile
41,853
75th Percentile

The average Norton Comando has 25,581 miles when tested for MOT.

📊 Mileage-Adjusted Failure Rate

How often this car fails MOT relative to how much it's driven — a fairer comparison than raw pass rate.

3.17%
Fail Rate per 10K Miles
Average across all makes: 5.38%
8.1%
Overall Fail Rate
25,581 avg miles
✅ Good — below average failure rate

The Norton Comando has a mileage-adjusted failure rate of 3.17% per 10,000 miles driven. The average across all makes is 5.38%, so this model is better than average.

About Norton Comando MOT Data

The Norton Comando is a rare vehicle in the UK, with 754 MOT test results recorded in our database spanning 6 manufacture years. It has an overall MOT pass rate of 91.9% and a failure rate of 8.1%, which is well above the UK average of approximately 37%.

For Norton Comando owners, these results suggest a reliable vehicle that generally passes its MOT without major issues. Focus your pre-MOT checks on motorcycle lighting and signalling and motorcycle brakes for the best chance of a first-time pass. Use our detailed year-by-year breakdown and failure analysis below to understand how your specific Comando is likely to perform.

Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 5.4% of failures

Motorcycle lighting and signalling issues account for 5.4% of MOT failures on the Norton Comando. Motorcycle lighting and signalling issues are a common cause of MOT failure. Regular inspection and maintenance of these components helps ensure your vehicle passes its MOT. Typical repair costs: £100–400. Pre-MOT check: Have this system checked during regular servicing. Look for warning signs like unusual noises, vibrations, or dashboard warning lights.

Motorcycle brakes — 2.1% of failures

Motorcycle brakes issues account for 2.1% of MOT failures on the Norton Comando. Brake-related failures include worn brake pads, corroded brake discs, leaking brake lines, and faulty brake servos. These are safety-critical components — any brake deficiency will result in an MOT fail. Typical repair costs: £150–400. Pre-MOT check: Listen for squealing or grinding noises. Check brake pedal feel — if it feels spongy or goes to the floor, have the system inspected immediately. Look at brake pad thickness through the wheel spokes (minimum 3mm).

Motorcycle drive system — 1.2% of failures

Motorcycle drive system issues account for 1.2% of MOT failures on the Norton Comando. Motorcycle drive system issues are a common cause of MOT failure. Regular inspection and maintenance of these components helps ensure your vehicle passes its MOT. Typical repair costs: £100–400. Pre-MOT check: Have this system checked during regular servicing. Look for warning signs like unusual noises, vibrations, or dashboard warning lights.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Norton Comando?

Based on 754 MOT tests in our database, the Norton Comando has an overall pass rate of 91.9% (8.1% fail rate).

What are the most common MOT failures on a Norton Comando?

The top 3 reasons a Norton Comando fails its MOT are: 1. Motorcycle lighting and signalling (5.4%), 2. Motorcycle brakes (2.1%), 3. Motorcycle drive system (1.2%). Check these areas before booking your MOT.

Is the Norton Comando reliable?

With a 8.1% MOT failure rate, the Comando is more reliable than average compared to the UK average of ~40%.

What should I check before an MOT on my Norton Comando?

Based on failure data, focus on: Motorcycle lighting and signalling (5.4%); Motorcycle brakes (2.1%); Motorcycle drive system (1.2%). These are the areas most likely to cause a fail. Also check all lights, tyres (minimum 1.6mm tread), and windscreen condition — these are quick wins that apply to all cars.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue