Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

2000 Fiat Seicento — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 2000 perform at MOT as they age

26 years
Current Age
49.7%
Latest Pass Rate
43,090
Total Tests (All Years)
53,158 mi
Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Insufficient data for same-age comparison.

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 2000 Fiat Seicento as it ages.

9 yrs49.1%
10 yrs46.5%
11 yrs44.7%
12 yrs42.5%
13 yrs42.0%
14 yrs43.9%
15 yrs43.7%
16 yrs44.8%
17 yrs45.9%
18 yrs46.2%
19 yrs50.9%
20 yrs58.5%
21 yrs50.0%
22 yrs47.4%
23 yrs52.8%
24 yrs49.7%

Bar chart showing pass rate by car age from 9 to 24 years

Fail Rate %
📊 View as table
AgePass RateTests
9 yrs49.1%7,712
10 yrs46.5%7,130
11 yrs44.7%6,486
12 yrs42.5%5,559
13 yrs42.0%4,514
14 yrs43.9%3,486
15 yrs43.7%2,613
16 yrs44.8%1,911
17 yrs45.9%1,270
18 yrs46.2%658
19 yrs50.9%464
20 yrs58.5%325
21 yrs50.0%346
22 yrs47.4%213
23 yrs52.8%216
24 yrs49.7%187

Pass Rate Trend

How the 2000 Fiat Seicento pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

Trend shows improving over 16 years

Pass Rate %
📊 View as table
BuiltPass RateTests
2024 (24 yrs)49.7%187
2023 (23 yrs)52.8%216
2022 (22 yrs)47.4%213
2021 (21 yrs)50%346
2020 (20 yrs)58.5%325
2019 (19 yrs)50.9%464
2018 (18 yrs)46.2%658
2017 (17 yrs)45.9%1,270
2016 (16 yrs)44.8%1,911
2015 (15 yrs)43.7%2,613
2014 (14 yrs)43.9%3,486
2013 (13 yrs)42%4,514
2012 (12 yrs)42.5%5,559
2011 (11 yrs)44.7%6,486
2010 (10 yrs)46.5%7,130
2009 (9 yrs)49.1%7,712

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2009High Fail Rate
49.1%
Age (yrs) 9Tests 7,712Avg Mileage 51,598Top Failure Brakes — 34.6%
2010High Fail Rate
46.5%
Age (yrs) 10Tests 7,130Avg Mileage 55,200Top Failure Brakes — 37.7%
2011High Fail Rate
44.7%
Age (yrs) 11Tests 6,486Avg Mileage 58,026Top Failure Brakes — 38.8%
2012High Fail Rate
42.5%
Age (yrs) 12Tests 5,559Avg Mileage 61,571Top Failure Brakes — 40.7%
2013High Fail Rate
42.0%
Age (yrs) 13Tests 4,514Avg Mileage 62,248Top Failure Brakes — 120.7%
2014High Fail Rate
43.9%
Age (yrs) 14Tests 3,486Avg Mileage 62,810Top Failure Brakes — 116.6%
2015High Fail Rate
43.7%
Age (yrs) 15Tests 2,613Avg Mileage 63,892Top Failure Brakes — 107.5%
2016High Fail Rate
44.8%
Age (yrs) 16Tests 1,911Avg Mileage 62,813Top Failure Brakes — 100.1%
2017High Fail Rate
45.9%
Age (yrs) 17Tests 1,270Avg Mileage 62,286Top Failure Brakes — 103.5%
2018High Fail Rate
46.2%
Age (yrs) 18Tests 658Avg Mileage 60,064Top Failure Brakes — 93.5%
2019High Fail Rate
50.9%
Age (yrs) 19Tests 464Avg Mileage 59,098Top Failure Brakes — 81.3%
2020High Fail Rate
58.5%
Age (yrs) 20Tests 325Avg Mileage 56,956Top Failure Brakes — 59.1%
2021High Fail Rate
50.0%
Age (yrs) 21Tests 346Avg Mileage 56,674Top Failure Brakes — 78.0%
2022High Fail Rate
47.4%
Age (yrs) 22Tests 213Avg Mileage 55,658Top Failure Brakes — 79.8%
2023High Fail Rate
52.8%
Age (yrs) 23Tests 216Avg Mileage 54,522Top Failure Brakes — 81.0%
2024High Fail Rate
49.7%
Age (yrs) 24Tests 187Avg Mileage 53,158Top Failure Brakes — 65.2%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 2000 Fiat Seicento, with age trends.

Brakes
77.4%
↑ Increases with age
Suspension
49.2%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
46.3%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
45.5%
↑ Increases with age
Body, chassis, structure
27.9%
— Consistent

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

CategoryAt YoungestAt OldestChangeTrend
Suspension13.0% (9 yrs)63.6% (24 yrs)
+50.6%
🔴 ↑
Brakes34.6% (9 yrs)65.2% (24 yrs)
+30.6%
🔴 ↑

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Fiat Seicento page →

About This Data

This page shows how Fiat Seicento cars manufactured in 2000 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2009 to 2024, covering 43,090 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue