Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

2008 Land Rover Defender — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 2008 perform at MOT as they age

18 years
Current Age
69.1%
Latest Pass Rate
55,785
Total Tests (All Years)
98,546 mi
Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Compared to Average at Age 16

This car: 69.1%
Average: 52.7%

✅ 16.4% above average (10212 models compared)

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 2008 Land Rover Defender as it ages.

2 yrs84.8%
3 yrs76.5%
4 yrs73.8%
5 yrs71.7%
6 yrs69.4%
7 yrs68.5%
8 yrs67.6%
9 yrs67.4%
10 yrs66.0%
11 yrs64.5%
12 yrs65.8%
13 yrs65.9%
14 yrs66.3%
15 yrs67.2%
16 yrs69.1%

Bar chart showing pass rate by car age from 2 to 16 years

Fail Rate %
📊 View as table
AgePass RateTests
2 yrs84.8%164
3 yrs76.5%4,431
4 yrs73.8%4,374
5 yrs71.7%4,307
6 yrs69.4%4,222
7 yrs68.5%4,162
8 yrs67.6%4,063
9 yrs67.4%4,455
10 yrs66.0%3,126
11 yrs64.5%3,193
12 yrs65.8%3,237
13 yrs65.9%4,092
14 yrs66.3%3,297
15 yrs67.2%4,012
16 yrs69.1%4,650

Pass Rate Trend

How the 2008 Land Rover Defender pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

Trend shows improving over 15 years

Pass Rate %
📊 View as table
BuiltPass RateTests
2024 (16 yrs)69.1%4,650
2023 (15 yrs)67.2%4,012
2022 (14 yrs)66.3%3,297
2021 (13 yrs)65.9%4,092
2020 (12 yrs)65.8%3,237
2019 (11 yrs)64.5%3,193
2018 (10 yrs)66%3,126
2017 (9 yrs)67.4%4,455
2016 (8 yrs)67.6%4,063
2015 (7 yrs)68.5%4,162
2014 (6 yrs)69.4%4,222
2013 (5 yrs)71.7%4,307
2012 (4 yrs)73.8%4,374
2011 (3 yrs)76.5%4,431
2010 (2 yrs)84.8%164

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2010
84.8%
Age (yrs) 2Tests 164Avg Mileage 28,506Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 8.5%
2011
76.5%
Age (yrs) 3Tests 4,431Avg Mileage 30,171Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 14.1%
2012
73.8%
Age (yrs) 4Tests 4,374Avg Mileage 38,076Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 16.8%
2013
71.7%
Age (yrs) 5Tests 4,307Avg Mileage 45,567Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 29.6%
2014
69.4%
Age (yrs) 6Tests 4,222Avg Mileage 52,040Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 31.9%
2015
68.5%
Age (yrs) 7Tests 4,162Avg Mileage 59,117Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 31.9%
2016
67.6%
Age (yrs) 8Tests 4,063Avg Mileage 64,507Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 33.7%
2017
67.4%
Age (yrs) 9Tests 4,455Avg Mileage 71,773Top Failure Brakes — 34.7%
2018
66.0%
Age (yrs) 10Tests 3,126Avg Mileage 76,140Top Failure Brakes — 44.8%
2019High Fail Rate
64.5%
Age (yrs) 11Tests 3,193Avg Mileage 81,334Top Failure Brakes — 44.0%
2020
65.8%
Age (yrs) 12Tests 3,237Avg Mileage 85,377Top Failure Brakes — 40.3%
2021
65.9%
Age (yrs) 13Tests 4,092Avg Mileage 90,662Top Failure Brakes — 44.6%
2022
66.3%
Age (yrs) 14Tests 3,297Avg Mileage 91,852Top Failure Brakes — 44.0%
2023
67.2%
Age (yrs) 15Tests 4,012Avg Mileage 95,207Top Failure Brakes — 42.9%
2024
69.1%
Age (yrs) 16Tests 4,650Avg Mileage 98,546Top Failure Brakes — 31.8%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 2008 Land Rover Defender, with age trends.

Brakes
32.7%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
29.9%
— Consistent
Suspension
26.6%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
23.6%
↑ Increases with age
Steering
15.7%
↑ Increases with age

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

CategoryAt YoungestAt OldestChangeTrend
Suspension2.4% (2 yrs)31.3% (16 yrs)
+28.9%
🔴 ↑
Steering3.0% (2 yrs)18.2% (16 yrs)
+15.2%
🔴 ↑

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Land Rover Defender page →

About This Data

This page shows how Land Rover Defender cars manufactured in 2008 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2010 to 2024, covering 55,785 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue