2006 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 2006 perform at MOT as they age

20 years

Current Age

55.3%

Latest Pass Rate

28,934

Total Tests (All Years)

135,421 mi

Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Compared to Average at Age 18

This car: 55.3%

Average: 54.3%

✅ 1.0% above average (8383 models compared)

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 2006 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab as it ages.

3 yrs72.8%

→ ↓0.0%

4 yrs72.8%

→ ↓4.8%

5 yrs68.0%

→ ↓4.5%

6 yrs63.5%

→ ↓5.2%

7 yrs58.3%

→ ↓5.4%

8 yrs52.9%

→ ↑2.5%

9 yrs55.4%

→ ↓0.4%

10 yrs55.0%

→ ↓1.8%

11 yrs53.2%

→ ↑0.3%

12 yrs53.5%

→ ↓1.8%

13 yrs51.7%

→ ↑4.2%

14 yrs55.9%

→ ↓1.1%

15 yrs54.8%

→ ↓2.6%

16 yrs52.2%

→ ↑1.3%

17 yrs53.5%

→ ↑1.8%

18 yrs55.3%

📊 View as table

Age	Pass Rate	Tests
3 yrs	72.8%	2,338
4 yrs	72.8%	2,329
5 yrs	68.0%	2,324
6 yrs	63.5%	2,307
7 yrs	58.3%	2,260
8 yrs	52.9%	2,240
9 yrs	55.4%	2,193
10 yrs	55.0%	2,093
11 yrs	53.2%	2,032
12 yrs	53.5%	1,277
13 yrs	51.7%	1,322
14 yrs	55.9%	1,259
15 yrs	54.8%	1,477
16 yrs	52.2%	1,106
17 yrs	53.5%	1,124
18 yrs	55.3%	1,253

Pass Rate Trend

How the 2006 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

📊 View as table

Built	Pass Rate	Tests
2024 (18 yrs)	55.3%	1,253
2023 (17 yrs)	53.5%	1,124
2022 (16 yrs)	52.2%	1,106
2021 (15 yrs)	54.8%	1,477
2020 (14 yrs)	55.9%	1,259
2019 (13 yrs)	51.7%	1,322
2018 (12 yrs)	53.5%	1,277
2017 (11 yrs)	53.2%	2,032
2016 (10 yrs)	55%	2,093
2015 (9 yrs)	55.4%	2,193
2014 (8 yrs)	52.9%	2,240
2013 (7 yrs)	58.3%	2,260
2012 (6 yrs)	63.5%	2,307
2011 (5 yrs)	68%	2,324
2010 (4 yrs)	72.8%	2,329
2009 (3 yrs)	72.8%	2,338

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2009

72.8%

Age (yrs) 3Tests 2,338Avg Mileage 38,938Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 14.5%

2010

72.8%

Age (yrs) 4Tests 2,329Avg Mileage 50,237Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 13.6%

2011

68.0%

Age (yrs) 5Tests 2,324Avg Mileage 59,624Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 18.1%

2012High Fail Rate

63.5%

Age (yrs) 6Tests 2,307Avg Mileage 69,419Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 20.4%

2013High Fail Rate

58.3%

Age (yrs) 7Tests 2,260Avg Mileage 77,323Top Failure Suspension — 57.3%

2014High Fail Rate

52.9%

Age (yrs) 8Tests 2,240Avg Mileage 85,149Top Failure Suspension — 67.0%

2015High Fail Rate

55.4%

Age (yrs) 9Tests 2,193Avg Mileage 93,425Top Failure Suspension — 67.9%

2016High Fail Rate

55.0%

Age (yrs) 10Tests 2,093Avg Mileage 100,487Top Failure Suspension — 67.7%

2017High Fail Rate

53.2%

Age (yrs) 11Tests 2,032Avg Mileage 107,602Top Failure Suspension — 77.8%

2018High Fail Rate

53.5%

Age (yrs) 12Tests 1,277Avg Mileage 112,924Top Failure Suspension — 70.4%

2019High Fail Rate

51.7%

Age (yrs) 13Tests 1,322Avg Mileage 116,910Top Failure Suspension — 77.8%

2020High Fail Rate

55.9%

Age (yrs) 14Tests 1,259Avg Mileage 121,499Top Failure Suspension — 71.2%

2021High Fail Rate

54.8%

Age (yrs) 15Tests 1,477Avg Mileage 125,113Top Failure Suspension — 82.5%

2022High Fail Rate

52.2%

Age (yrs) 16Tests 1,106Avg Mileage 129,533Top Failure Suspension — 96.9%

2023High Fail Rate

53.5%

Age (yrs) 17Tests 1,124Avg Mileage 131,028Top Failure Suspension — 91.4%

2024High Fail Rate

55.3%

Age (yrs) 18Tests 1,253Avg Mileage 135,421Top Failure Suspension — 79.1%

MOT results for 2006 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab by test year
Test Year▲	Age (yrs)▲▼	Pass Rate▲▼	Tests▲▼	Avg Mileage▲▼	Top Failure▲▼
2009	3	72.8%	2,338	38,938	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 14.5%
2010	4	72.8%	2,329	50,237	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 13.6%
2011	5	68.0%	2,324	59,624	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 18.1%
2012	6	63.5%	2,307	69,419	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 20.4%
2013	7	58.3%	2,260	77,323	Suspension — 57.3%
2014	8	52.9%	2,240	85,149	Suspension — 67.0%
2015	9	55.4%	2,193	93,425	Suspension — 67.9%
2016	10	55.0%	2,093	100,487	Suspension — 67.7%
2017	11	53.2%	2,032	107,602	Suspension — 77.8%
2018	12	53.5%	1,277	112,924	Suspension — 70.4%
2019	13	51.7%	1,322	116,910	Suspension — 77.8%
2020	14	55.9%	1,259	121,499	Suspension — 71.2%
2021	15	54.8%	1,477	125,113	Suspension — 82.5%
2022	16	52.2%	1,106	129,533	Suspension — 96.9%
2023	17	53.5%	1,124	131,028	Suspension — 91.4%
2024	18	55.3%	1,253	135,421	Suspension — 79.1%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 2006 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab, with age trends.

Suspension

60.5%

↑ Increases with age

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment

60.0%

↑ Increases with age

Brakes

48.3%

↑ Increases with age

Body, chassis, structure

39.6%

↑ Increases with age

Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment

35.6%

↑ Increases with age

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

Category	At Youngest	At Oldest	Change	Trend
Suspension	11.8% (3 yrs)	79.1% (18 yrs)	+67.3%	🔴 ↑
Brakes	5.0% (3 yrs)	61.8% (18 yrs)	+56.8%	🔴 ↑

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab page →

About This Data

This page shows how Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab cars manufactured in 2006 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2009 to 2024, covering 28,934 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.