2008 Mitsubishi L200 — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 2008 perform at MOT as they age

18 years

Current Age

55.9%

Latest Pass Rate

49,473

Total Tests (All Years)

134,496 mi

Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Compared to Average at Age 16

This car: 55.9%

Average: 52.7%

✅ 3.2% above average (10212 models compared)

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 2008 Mitsubishi L200 as it ages.

2 yrs70.4%

→ ↓0.3%

3 yrs70.1%

→ ↓1.1%

4 yrs69.0%

→ ↓6.2%

5 yrs62.8%

→ ↓3.1%

6 yrs59.7%

→ ↓0.2%

7 yrs59.5%

→ ↓2.4%

8 yrs57.1%

→ ↓1.1%

9 yrs56.0%

→ ↓3.7%

10 yrs52.3%

→ ↓0.6%

11 yrs51.7%

→ ↑0.2%

12 yrs51.9%

→ ↑2.1%

13 yrs54.0%

→ ↓2.7%

14 yrs51.3%

→ ↑2.6%

15 yrs53.9%

→ ↑2.0%

16 yrs55.9%

📊 View as table

Age	Pass Rate	Tests
2 yrs	70.4%	115
3 yrs	70.1%	4,864
4 yrs	69.0%	4,486
5 yrs	62.8%	4,433
6 yrs	59.7%	4,310
7 yrs	59.5%	4,210
8 yrs	57.1%	4,062
9 yrs	56.0%	3,902
10 yrs	52.3%	2,675
11 yrs	51.7%	2,691
12 yrs	51.9%	2,540
13 yrs	54.0%	3,321
14 yrs	51.3%	2,491
15 yrs	53.9%	2,719
16 yrs	55.9%	2,654

Pass Rate Trend

How the 2008 Mitsubishi L200 pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

📊 View as table

Built	Pass Rate	Tests
2024 (16 yrs)	55.9%	2,654
2023 (15 yrs)	53.9%	2,719
2022 (14 yrs)	51.3%	2,491
2021 (13 yrs)	54%	3,321
2020 (12 yrs)	51.9%	2,540
2019 (11 yrs)	51.7%	2,691
2018 (10 yrs)	52.3%	2,675
2017 (9 yrs)	56%	3,902
2016 (8 yrs)	57.1%	4,062
2015 (7 yrs)	59.5%	4,210
2014 (6 yrs)	59.7%	4,310
2013 (5 yrs)	62.8%	4,433
2012 (4 yrs)	69%	4,486
2011 (3 yrs)	70.1%	4,864
2010 (2 yrs)	70.4%	115

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2010

70.4%

Age (yrs) 2Tests 115Avg Mileage 38,269Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 17.4%

2011

70.1%

Age (yrs) 3Tests 4,864Avg Mileage 43,363Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 16.0%

2012

69.0%

Age (yrs) 4Tests 4,486Avg Mileage 54,163Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 15.4%

2013High Fail Rate

62.8%

Age (yrs) 5Tests 4,433Avg Mileage 64,409Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 32.7%

2014High Fail Rate

59.7%

Age (yrs) 6Tests 4,310Avg Mileage 73,767Top Failure Brakes — 46.4%

2015High Fail Rate

59.5%

Age (yrs) 7Tests 4,210Avg Mileage 82,557Top Failure Brakes — 50.9%

2016High Fail Rate

57.1%

Age (yrs) 8Tests 4,062Avg Mileage 91,203Top Failure Brakes — 58.2%

2017High Fail Rate

56.0%

Age (yrs) 9Tests 3,902Avg Mileage 99,093Top Failure Brakes — 69.8%

2018High Fail Rate

52.3%

Age (yrs) 10Tests 2,675Avg Mileage 105,505Top Failure Brakes — 75.4%

2019High Fail Rate

51.7%

Age (yrs) 11Tests 2,691Avg Mileage 112,109Top Failure Brakes — 77.3%

2020High Fail Rate

51.9%

Age (yrs) 12Tests 2,540Avg Mileage 116,936Top Failure Brakes — 79.8%

2021High Fail Rate

54.0%

Age (yrs) 13Tests 3,321Avg Mileage 121,953Top Failure Brakes — 78.1%

2022High Fail Rate

51.3%

Age (yrs) 14Tests 2,491Avg Mileage 127,060Top Failure Brakes — 85.6%

2023High Fail Rate

53.9%

Age (yrs) 15Tests 2,719Avg Mileage 129,824Top Failure Brakes — 83.7%

2024High Fail Rate

55.9%

Age (yrs) 16Tests 2,654Avg Mileage 134,496Top Failure Suspension — 61.9%

MOT results for 2008 Mitsubishi L200 by test year
Test Year▲	Age (yrs)▲▼	Pass Rate▲▼	Tests▲▼	Avg Mileage▲▼	Top Failure▲▼
2010	2	70.4%	115	38,269	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 17.4%
2011	3	70.1%	4,864	43,363	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 16.0%
2012	4	69.0%	4,486	54,163	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 15.4%
2013	5	62.8%	4,433	64,409	Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 32.7%
2014	6	59.7%	4,310	73,767	Brakes — 46.4%
2015	7	59.5%	4,210	82,557	Brakes — 50.9%
2016	8	57.1%	4,062	91,203	Brakes — 58.2%
2017	9	56.0%	3,902	99,093	Brakes — 69.8%
2018	10	52.3%	2,675	105,505	Brakes — 75.4%
2019	11	51.7%	2,691	112,109	Brakes — 77.3%
2020	12	51.9%	2,540	116,936	Brakes — 79.8%
2021	13	54.0%	3,321	121,953	Brakes — 78.1%
2022	14	51.3%	2,491	127,060	Brakes — 85.6%
2023	15	53.9%	2,719	129,824	Brakes — 83.7%
2024	16	55.9%	2,654	134,496	Suspension — 61.9%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 2008 Mitsubishi L200, with age trends.

Brakes

54.7%

↑ Increases with age

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment

52.4%

↑ Increases with age

Suspension

43.6%

↑ Increases with age

Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment

30.9%

↑ Increases with age

Body, chassis, structure

30.5%

↑ Increases with age

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

Category	At Youngest	At Oldest	Change	Trend
Suspension	5.2% (2 yrs)	61.9% (16 yrs)	+56.7%	🔴 ↑
Brakes	5.2% (2 yrs)	60.2% (16 yrs)	+55.0%	🔴 ↑
Tyres	4.3% (2 yrs)	15.6% (16 yrs)	+11.3%	🔴 ↑

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Mitsubishi L200 page →

About This Data

This page shows how Mitsubishi L200 cars manufactured in 2008 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2010 to 2024, covering 49,473 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.