Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

2000 Mitsubishi Pajero — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 2000 perform at MOT as they age

26 years
Current Age
62.2%
Latest Pass Rate
1,665
Total Tests (All Years)
134,214 mi
Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Insufficient data for same-age comparison.

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero as it ages.

9 yrs63.2%
10 yrs60.1%
11 yrs58.7%
12 yrs64.5%
13 yrs61.3%
14 yrs52.9%
15 yrs64.9%
16 yrs52.5%
17 yrs52.2%
18 yrs55.9%
19 yrs64.9%
20 yrs44.7%
21 yrs64.9%
22 yrs63.7%
23 yrs65.8%
24 yrs62.2%

Bar chart showing pass rate by car age from 9 to 24 years

Fail Rate %
📊 View as table
AgePass RateTests
9 yrs63.2%155
10 yrs60.1%153
11 yrs58.7%150
12 yrs64.5%141
13 yrs61.3%137
14 yrs52.9%119
15 yrs64.9%111
16 yrs52.5%99
17 yrs52.2%90
18 yrs55.9%59
19 yrs64.9%57
20 yrs44.7%47
21 yrs64.9%114
22 yrs63.7%80
23 yrs65.8%79
24 yrs62.2%74

Pass Rate Trend

How the 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

Trend shows declining over 16 years

Pass Rate %
📊 View as table
BuiltPass RateTests
2024 (24 yrs)62.2%74
2023 (23 yrs)65.8%79
2022 (22 yrs)63.7%80
2021 (21 yrs)64.9%114
2020 (20 yrs)44.7%47
2019 (19 yrs)64.9%57
2018 (18 yrs)55.9%59
2017 (17 yrs)52.2%90
2016 (16 yrs)52.5%99
2015 (15 yrs)64.9%111
2014 (14 yrs)52.9%119
2013 (13 yrs)61.3%137
2012 (12 yrs)64.5%141
2011 (11 yrs)58.7%150
2010 (10 yrs)60.1%153
2009 (9 yrs)63.2%155

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2009High Fail Rate
63.2%
Age (yrs) 9Tests 155Avg Mileage 96,798Top Failure Suspension — 21.3%
2010High Fail Rate
60.1%
Age (yrs) 10Tests 153Avg Mileage 104,422Top Failure Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment — 26.1%
2011High Fail Rate
58.7%
Age (yrs) 11Tests 150Avg Mileage 109,644Top Failure Brakes — 23.3%
2012High Fail Rate
64.5%
Age (yrs) 12Tests 141Avg Mileage 118,275Top Failure Brakes — 19.9%
2013High Fail Rate
61.3%
Age (yrs) 13Tests 137Avg Mileage 123,348Top Failure Brakes — 62.0%
2014High Fail Rate
52.9%
Age (yrs) 14Tests 119Avg Mileage 117,194Top Failure Suspension — 88.2%
2015High Fail Rate
64.9%
Age (yrs) 15Tests 111Avg Mileage 121,032Top Failure Suspension — 64.0%
2016High Fail Rate
52.5%
Age (yrs) 16Tests 99Avg Mileage 118,143Top Failure Brakes — 66.7%
2017High Fail Rate
52.2%
Age (yrs) 17Tests 90Avg Mileage 124,611Top Failure Suspension — 74.4%
2018High Fail Rate
55.9%
Age (yrs) 18Tests 59Avg Mileage 130,321Top Failure Suspension — 66.1%
2019High Fail Rate
64.9%
Age (yrs) 19Tests 57Avg Mileage 125,036Top Failure Brakes — 52.6%
2020High Fail Rate
44.7%
Age (yrs) 20Tests 47Avg Mileage 128,001Top Failure Suspension — 87.2%
2021High Fail Rate
64.9%
Age (yrs) 21Tests 114Avg Mileage 178,020Top Failure Body, chassis, structure — 72.8%
2022High Fail Rate
63.7%
Age (yrs) 22Tests 80Avg Mileage 152,494Top Failure Suspension — 78.8%
2023
65.8%
Age (yrs) 23Tests 79Avg Mileage 154,115Top Failure Brakes — 48.1%
2024High Fail Rate
62.2%
Age (yrs) 24Tests 74Avg Mileage 134,214Top Failure Suspension — 106.8%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero, with age trends.

Suspension
56.3%
↑ Increases with age
Brakes
49.0%
↑ Increases with age
Body, chassis, structure
44.3%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
38.7%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
33.4%
↑ Increases with age

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

CategoryAt YoungestAt OldestChangeTrend
Suspension21.3% (9 yrs)106.8% (24 yrs)
+85.5%
🔴 ↑
Brakes16.8% (9 yrs)78.4% (24 yrs)
+61.6%
🔴 ↑

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Mitsubishi Pajero page →

About This Data

This page shows how Mitsubishi Pajero cars manufactured in 2000 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2009 to 2024, covering 1,665 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue