Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

Suzuki Uf50 MOT Pass Rate

Overall pass rate across all manufacture years, based on 323 real MOT test results. Failure rate: 34.4%.

65.6%
Pass Rate
34.4%
Fail Rate
323
Total Tests
Motorcycle lighting and signalling
Top Failure

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Suzuki Uf50 MOT Reliability Overview

The Suzuki Uf50 is a rare vehicle in the UK, with 323 MOT test results recorded in our database spanning 3 manufacture years. It has an overall MOT pass rate of 65.6% and a failure rate of 34.4%, which is slightly above the UK average of approximately 37%.

Based on this data, the Suzuki Uf50 earns a "Good" reliability rating. The average Suzuki Uf50 presents for MOT with approximately 15,258 miles on the clock. Manufacture year matters: 2002 models achieve the highest pass rate at 68.9%, while 2000 models have the lowest at 61.6%. This 7.3 percentage point difference suggests notable variation in build quality or component durability across production years.

The most common MOT failure for the Suzuki Uf50 is Motorcycle lighting and signalling, affecting 20.7% of all tests. Motorcycle lighting and signalling issues are a common cause of MOT failure. Regular inspection and maintenance of these components helps ensure your vehicle passes its MOT. The second most common issue is Motorcycle steering and suspension at 19.8%. Motorcycle brakes rounds out the top three at 18.3%. Together, these top 3 failure categories account for a significant portion of all MOT failures for this model.

Top failures across all manufacture years combined. Individual year pages may show different top failures.

What Fails Most

Motorcycle lighting and signalling 20.7%
Motorcycle steering and suspension 19.8%
Motorcycle brakes 18.3%
⚖️ Compare

Best Year to Buy

📊
Insufficient data per manufacture year for this analysis

📈 How Each Vintage Ages

📈
Insufficient data per manufacture year for this analysis

Pass Rate by Manufacture Year

68.9%
Tests Avg Mileage 21,384Top Failure Motorcycle brakes
67.5%
Tests Avg Mileage 13,740Top Failure Motorcycle steering and suspension
2000High Fail Rate
61.6%
Tests Avg Mileage 15,268Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling

* High Fail Rate badge indicates an MOT pass rate below 65% (failure rate above 35%).

What Fails on This Car?

Click a category to see specific failure items.

View as table
MOT failure categories ranked by failure rate
RankFailure CategoryRate (%)Count
1Motorcycle Lighting And Signalling29.4%95
2Motorcycle Steering And Suspension27.2%88
3Motorcycle Brakes24.1%78
4Motorcycle Fuel And Exhaust7.1%23
5Motorcycle Tyres And Wheels5.9%19
6Motorcycle Reg Plates And Vin4.3%14
7Motorcycle Body And Structure3.7%12
8Motorcycle Tyres1.2%4
9Motorcycle Lamps And Reflectors0.9%3
10Motorcycle Structure And Attachments0.9%3
11Motorcycle Suspension0.6%2
12Motorcycle Driving Controls0.3%1

Failures per 10,000 Miles

avg. 15,258 mi

For every 10,000 miles driven, this shows what percentage of MOT tests fail for each category. This accounts for how far cars are actually driven, not just raw pass/fail counts.

Motorcycle lighting and signalling19.28% per 10K miMotorcycle steering and suspension17.86% per 10K miMotorcycle brakes15.83% per 10K miMotorcycle fuel and exhaust4.67% per 10K miMotorcycle tyres and wheels3.86% per 10K miMotorcycle reg plates and vin2.84% per 10K miMotorcycle body and structure2.43% per 10K miMotorcycle tyres0.81% per 10K miMotorcycle lamps and reflectors0.61% per 10K miMotorcycle structure and attachments0.61% per 10K miMotorcycle suspension0.41% per 10K miMotorcycle driving controls0.20% per 10K mi
View as table
Mileage-normalised failure rates by category
CategoryRate / 10K miRaw %Count
Motorcycle lighting and signalling19.2829.4%95
Motorcycle steering and suspension17.8627.2%88
Motorcycle brakes15.8324.1%78
Motorcycle fuel and exhaust4.677.1%23
Motorcycle tyres and wheels3.865.9%19
Motorcycle reg plates and vin2.844.3%14
Motorcycle body and structure2.433.7%12
Motorcycle tyres0.811.2%4
Motorcycle lamps and reflectors0.610.9%3
Motorcycle structure and attachments0.610.9%3
Motorcycle suspension0.410.6%2
Motorcycle driving controls0.200.3%1

🚗 Similar Cars to Consider

🚗
No comparable models

Mileage at MOT

15,258
Mean
13,829
Median
6,164
25th Percentile
19,535
75th Percentile

The average Suzuki Uf50 has 15,258 miles when tested for MOT.

📊 Mileage-Adjusted Failure Rate

How often this car fails MOT relative to how much it's driven — a fairer comparison than raw pass rate.

22.55%
Fail Rate per 10K Miles
Average across all makes: 5.38%
34.4%
Overall Fail Rate
15,258 avg miles
🔴 Poor — above average failure rate

The Suzuki Uf50 has a mileage-adjusted failure rate of 22.55% per 10,000 miles driven. The average across all makes is 5.38%, so this model is worse than average.

About Suzuki Uf50 MOT Data

The Suzuki Uf50 is a rare vehicle in the UK, with 323 MOT test results recorded in our database spanning 3 manufacture years. It has an overall MOT pass rate of 65.6% and a failure rate of 34.4%, which is slightly above the UK average of approximately 37%.

For Suzuki Uf50 owners, these results suggest a reliable vehicle that generally passes its MOT without major issues. Focus your pre-MOT checks on motorcycle lighting and signalling and motorcycle steering and suspension for the best chance of a first-time pass. Use our detailed year-by-year breakdown and failure analysis below to understand how your specific Uf50 is likely to perform.

Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 20.7% of failures

Motorcycle lighting and signalling issues account for 20.7% of MOT failures on the Suzuki Uf50. Motorcycle lighting and signalling issues are a common cause of MOT failure. Regular inspection and maintenance of these components helps ensure your vehicle passes its MOT. Typical repair costs: £100–400. Pre-MOT check: Have this system checked during regular servicing. Look for warning signs like unusual noises, vibrations, or dashboard warning lights.

Motorcycle steering and suspension — 19.8% of failures

Motorcycle steering and suspension issues account for 19.8% of MOT failures on the Suzuki Uf50. Suspension failures typically involve worn bushes, leaking shock absorbers, broken coil springs, and damaged suspension arms. These affect ride quality, tyre wear, and road holding. Typical repair costs: £200–500. Pre-MOT check: Look for uneven tyre wear, listen for clunking over bumps, and check if the car pulls to one side. A bouncy ride suggests worn shock absorbers. Visually inspect coil springs for cracks.

Motorcycle brakes — 18.3% of failures

Motorcycle brakes issues account for 18.3% of MOT failures on the Suzuki Uf50. Brake-related failures include worn brake pads, corroded brake discs, leaking brake lines, and faulty brake servos. These are safety-critical components — any brake deficiency will result in an MOT fail. Typical repair costs: £150–400. Pre-MOT check: Listen for squealing or grinding noises. Check brake pedal feel — if it feels spongy or goes to the floor, have the system inspected immediately. Look at brake pad thickness through the wheel spokes (minimum 3mm).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MOT pass rate for the Suzuki Uf50?

Based on 323 MOT tests in our database, the Suzuki Uf50 has an overall pass rate of 65.6% (34.4% fail rate).

What are the most common MOT failures on a Suzuki Uf50?

The top 3 reasons a Suzuki Uf50 fails its MOT are: 1. Motorcycle lighting and signalling (20.7%), 2. Motorcycle steering and suspension (19.8%), 3. Motorcycle brakes (18.3%). Check these areas before booking your MOT.

Is the Suzuki Uf50 reliable?

With a 34.4% MOT failure rate, the Uf50 is more reliable than average compared to the UK average of ~40%.

What should I check before an MOT on my Suzuki Uf50?

Based on failure data, focus on: Motorcycle lighting and signalling (20.7%); Motorcycle steering and suspension (19.8%); Motorcycle brakes (18.3%). These are the areas most likely to cause a fail. Also check all lights, tyres (minimum 1.6mm tread), and windscreen condition — these are quick wins that apply to all cars.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue