Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

1999 Toyota Landcruiser Amazon — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 1999 perform at MOT as they age

27 years
Current Age
64.3%
Latest Pass Rate
4,744
Total Tests (All Years)
185,476 mi
Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Insufficient data for same-age comparison.

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 1999 Toyota Landcruiser Amazon as it ages.

10 yrs64.9%
11 yrs65.0%
12 yrs64.9%
13 yrs62.8%
14 yrs62.3%
15 yrs62.3%
16 yrs61.7%
17 yrs65.1%
18 yrs66.9%
19 yrs67.3%
20 yrs66.3%
21 yrs61.6%
22 yrs65.1%
23 yrs73.3%
24 yrs73.3%
25 yrs64.3%

Bar chart showing pass rate by car age from 10 to 25 years

Fail Rate %
📊 View as table
AgePass RateTests
10 yrs64.9%609
11 yrs65.0%569
12 yrs64.9%527
13 yrs62.8%489
14 yrs62.3%456
15 yrs62.3%440
16 yrs61.7%413
17 yrs65.1%390
18 yrs66.9%145
19 yrs67.3%110
20 yrs66.3%95
21 yrs61.6%86
22 yrs65.1%106
23 yrs73.3%90
24 yrs73.3%90
25 yrs64.3%129

Pass Rate Trend

How the 1999 Toyota Landcruiser Amazon pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

Trend shows declining over 16 years

Pass Rate %
📊 View as table
BuiltPass RateTests
2024 (25 yrs)64.3%129
2023 (24 yrs)73.3%90
2022 (23 yrs)73.3%90
2021 (22 yrs)65.1%106
2020 (21 yrs)61.6%86
2019 (20 yrs)66.3%95
2018 (19 yrs)67.3%110
2017 (18 yrs)66.9%145
2016 (17 yrs)65.1%390
2015 (16 yrs)61.7%413
2014 (15 yrs)62.3%440
2013 (14 yrs)62.3%456
2012 (13 yrs)62.8%489
2011 (12 yrs)64.9%527
2010 (11 yrs)65%569
2009 (10 yrs)64.9%609

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2009High Fail Rate
64.9%
Age (yrs) 10Tests 609Avg Mileage 118,240Top Failure Brakes — 19.9%
2010
65.0%
Age (yrs) 11Tests 569Avg Mileage 124,792Top Failure Brakes — 22.0%
2011High Fail Rate
64.9%
Age (yrs) 12Tests 527Avg Mileage 129,829Top Failure Brakes — 21.6%
2012High Fail Rate
62.8%
Age (yrs) 13Tests 489Avg Mileage 135,644Top Failure Suspension — 23.9%
2013High Fail Rate
62.3%
Age (yrs) 14Tests 456Avg Mileage 141,348Top Failure Brakes — 60.5%
2014High Fail Rate
62.3%
Age (yrs) 15Tests 440Avg Mileage 148,406Top Failure Suspension — 70.2%
2015High Fail Rate
61.7%
Age (yrs) 16Tests 413Avg Mileage 153,077Top Failure Suspension — 63.2%
2016
65.1%
Age (yrs) 17Tests 390Avg Mileage 159,377Top Failure Brakes — 54.6%
2017
66.9%
Age (yrs) 18Tests 145Avg Mileage 160,245Top Failure Suspension — 63.4%
2018
67.3%
Age (yrs) 19Tests 110Avg Mileage 162,106Top Failure Suspension — 50.0%
2019
66.3%
Age (yrs) 20Tests 95Avg Mileage 161,209Top Failure Brakes — 44.2%
2020High Fail Rate
61.6%
Age (yrs) 21Tests 86Avg Mileage 156,351Top Failure Suspension — 58.1%
2021
65.1%
Age (yrs) 22Tests 106Avg Mileage 171,638Top Failure Suspension — 58.5%
2022
73.3%
Age (yrs) 23Tests 90Avg Mileage 166,976Top Failure Brakes — 44.4%
2023
73.3%
Age (yrs) 24Tests 90Avg Mileage 167,619Top Failure Suspension — 56.7%
2024High Fail Rate
64.3%
Age (yrs) 25Tests 129Avg Mileage 185,476Top Failure Suspension — 64.3%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 1999 Toyota Landcruiser Amazon, with age trends.

Suspension
47.6%
↑ Increases with age
Brakes
43.9%
↑ Increases with age
Body, chassis, structure
30.0%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
27.9%
↑ Increases with age
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
26.7%
↑ Increases with age

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

CategoryAt YoungestAt OldestChangeTrend
Suspension19.0% (10 yrs)64.3% (25 yrs)
+45.3%
🔴 ↑
Brakes19.9% (10 yrs)46.5% (25 yrs)
+26.6%
🔴 ↑
Tyres7.2% (10 yrs)13.2% (25 yrs)
+6.0%
🔴 ↑

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Toyota Landcruiser Amazon page →

About This Data

This page shows how Toyota Landcruiser Amazon cars manufactured in 1999 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2009 to 2024, covering 4,744 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue