Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

2006 Honda Cbf1000 — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 2006 perform at MOT as they age

20 years
Current Age
85.0%
Latest Pass Rate
1,786
Total Tests (All Years)
32,007 mi
Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Compared to Average at Age 18

This car: 85.0%
Average: 54.3%

✅ 30.7% above average (8383 models compared)

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 2006 Honda Cbf1000 as it ages.

3 yrs84.6%
4 yrs91.0%
5 yrs82.0%
6 yrs84.8%
7 yrs89.0%
8 yrs86.6%
9 yrs86.9%
10 yrs92.1%
11 yrs84.3%
12 yrs87.0%
13 yrs80.8%
14 yrs84.5%
15 yrs86.9%
16 yrs83.1%
17 yrs92.9%
18 yrs85.0%

Bar chart showing pass rate by car age from 3 to 18 years

Fail Rate %
📊 View as table
AgePass RateTests
3 yrs84.6%156
4 yrs91.0%134
5 yrs82.0%139
6 yrs84.8%132
7 yrs89.0%136
8 yrs86.6%127
9 yrs86.9%122
10 yrs92.1%127
11 yrs84.3%127
12 yrs87.0%92
13 yrs80.8%78
14 yrs84.5%71
15 yrs86.9%84
16 yrs83.1%77
17 yrs92.9%84
18 yrs85.0%100

Pass Rate Trend

How the 2006 Honda Cbf1000 pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

Trend shows improving over 16 years

Pass Rate %
📊 View as table
BuiltPass RateTests
2024 (18 yrs)85%100
2023 (17 yrs)92.9%84
2022 (16 yrs)83.1%77
2021 (15 yrs)86.9%84
2020 (14 yrs)84.5%71
2019 (13 yrs)80.8%78
2018 (12 yrs)87%92
2017 (11 yrs)84.3%127
2016 (10 yrs)92.1%127
2015 (9 yrs)86.9%122
2014 (8 yrs)86.6%127
2013 (7 yrs)89%136
2012 (6 yrs)84.8%132
2011 (5 yrs)82%139
2010 (4 yrs)91%134
2009 (3 yrs)84.6%156

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2009
84.6%
Age (yrs) 3Tests 156Avg Mileage 11,324Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 9.0%
2010
91.0%
Age (yrs) 4Tests 134Avg Mileage 13,677Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 5.2%
2011
82.0%
Age (yrs) 5Tests 139Avg Mileage 16,617Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 9.4%
2012
84.8%
Age (yrs) 6Tests 132Avg Mileage 19,037Top Failure Motorcycle tyres and wheels — 7.6%
2013
89.0%
Age (yrs) 7Tests 136Avg Mileage 20,731Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 5.9%
2014
86.6%
Age (yrs) 8Tests 127Avg Mileage 23,546Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 11.8%
2015
86.9%
Age (yrs) 9Tests 122Avg Mileage 22,872Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 11.5%
2016
92.1%
Age (yrs) 10Tests 127Avg Mileage 24,755Top Failure Motorcycle steering and suspension — 7.1%
2017
84.3%
Age (yrs) 11Tests 127Avg Mileage 26,840Top Failure Motorcycle tyres and wheels — 8.7%
2018
87.0%
Age (yrs) 12Tests 92Avg Mileage 28,289Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 4.3%
2019
80.8%
Age (yrs) 13Tests 78Avg Mileage 31,182Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 17.9%
2020
84.5%
Age (yrs) 14Tests 71Avg Mileage 29,770Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 12.7%
2021
86.9%
Age (yrs) 15Tests 84Avg Mileage 30,876Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 14.3%
2022
83.1%
Age (yrs) 16Tests 77Avg Mileage 31,134Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 10.4%
2023
92.9%
Age (yrs) 17Tests 84Avg Mileage 31,647Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 7.1%
2024
85.0%
Age (yrs) 18Tests 100Avg Mileage 32,007Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 10.0%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 2006 Honda Cbf1000, with age trends.

Motorcycle brakes
7.7%
↑ Increases with age
Motorcycle lighting and signalling
6.7%
↓ Decreases with age
Motorcycle lamps and reflectors
6.6%
— Consistent
Motorcycle suspension
5.0%
↑ Increases with age
Motorcycle steering and suspension
4.8%
↑ Increases with age

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

CategoryAt YoungestAt OldestChangeTrend
Motorcycle brakes5.1% (3 yrs)10.0% (18 yrs)
+4.9%
🔴 ↑

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Honda Cbf1000 page →

About This Data

This page shows how Honda Cbf1000 cars manufactured in 2006 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2009 to 2024, covering 1,786 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue