Skip to main content
Pass Your MOT

1992 Suzuki Rgv250 — MOT History by Age

How cars manufactured in 1992 perform at MOT as they age

34 years
Current Age
96.4%
Latest Pass Rate
805
Total Tests (All Years)
16,772 mi
Avg Mileage (Latest)

Data from official DVSA MOT testing records

Best vintage for Rgv250

Insufficient data for same-age comparison.

How This Car Ages

Pass rate progression for the 1992 Suzuki Rgv250 as it ages.

17 yrs73.7%
18 yrs73.1%
19 yrs84.7%
20 yrs78.2%
21 yrs82.0%
22 yrs76.0%
23 yrs82.0%
24 yrs82.0%
25 yrs83.9%
26 yrs85.7%
27 yrs83.3%
28 yrs94.3%
29 yrs94.0%
30 yrs93.9%
31 yrs94.9%
32 yrs96.4%

Bar chart showing pass rate by car age from 17 to 32 years

Fail Rate %
📊 View as table
AgePass RateTests
17 yrs73.7%57
18 yrs73.1%52
19 yrs84.7%59
20 yrs78.2%55
21 yrs82.0%50
22 yrs76.0%50
23 yrs82.0%50
24 yrs82.0%50
25 yrs83.9%56
26 yrs85.7%35
27 yrs83.3%42
28 yrs94.3%35
29 yrs94.0%50
30 yrs93.9%49
31 yrs94.9%59
32 yrs96.4%56

Pass Rate Trend

How the 1992 Suzuki Rgv250 pass rate changes as it ages, from first MOT to most recent.

Trend shows improving over 16 years

Pass Rate %
📊 View as table
BuiltPass RateTests
2024 (32 yrs)96.4%56
2023 (31 yrs)94.9%59
2022 (30 yrs)93.9%49
2021 (29 yrs)94%50
2020 (28 yrs)94.3%35
2019 (27 yrs)83.3%42
2018 (26 yrs)85.7%35
2017 (25 yrs)83.9%56
2016 (24 yrs)82%50
2015 (23 yrs)82%50
2014 (22 yrs)76%50
2013 (21 yrs)82%50
2012 (20 yrs)78.2%55
2011 (19 yrs)84.7%59
2010 (18 yrs)73.1%52
2009 (17 yrs)73.7%57

Year-by-Year MOT Results

2009
73.7%
Age (yrs) 17Tests 57Avg Mileage 18,790Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 14.0%
2010
73.1%
Age (yrs) 18Tests 52Avg Mileage 19,344Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 15.4%
2011
84.7%
Age (yrs) 19Tests 59Avg Mileage 17,791Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 11.9%
2012
78.2%
Age (yrs) 20Tests 55Avg Mileage 17,520Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 16.4%
2013
82.0%
Age (yrs) 21Tests 50Avg Mileage 16,379Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 18.0%
2014
76.0%
Age (yrs) 22Tests 50Avg Mileage 16,822Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 20.0%
2015
82.0%
Age (yrs) 23Tests 50Avg Mileage 16,828Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 8.0%
2016
82.0%
Age (yrs) 24Tests 50Avg Mileage 16,733Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 12.0%
2017
83.9%
Age (yrs) 25Tests 56Avg Mileage 17,093Top Failure Motorcycle lighting and signalling — 14.3%
2018
85.7%
Age (yrs) 26Tests 35Avg Mileage 16,297Top Failure Motorcycle brakes — 5.7%
2019
83.3%
Age (yrs) 27Tests 42Avg Mileage 19,040Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 7.1%
2020
94.3%
Age (yrs) 28Tests 35Avg Mileage 19,547Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 14.3%
2021
94.0%
Age (yrs) 29Tests 50Avg Mileage 19,033Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 4.0%
2022
93.9%
Age (yrs) 30Tests 49Avg Mileage 16,854Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 8.2%
2023
94.9%
Age (yrs) 31Tests 59Avg Mileage 15,784Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 5.1%
2024
96.4%
Age (yrs) 32Tests 56Avg Mileage 16,772Top Failure Motorcycle lamps and reflectors — 3.6%

Common MOT Failures

Top failure categories across all test years for 1992 Suzuki Rgv250, with age trends.

Motorcycle lighting and signalling
13.6%
↓ Decreases with age
Motorcycle steering and suspension
7.4%
↑ Increases with age
Motorcycle lamps and reflectors
7.1%
↓ Decreases with age
Motorcycle reg plates and vin
6.1%
↓ Decreases with age
Motorcycle brakes
5.7%
↓ Decreases with age

How Failures Change With Age

Comparing failure rates between the youngest and oldest test years.

Not enough data to compare failures across ages.

Other Manufacture Years

Looking for the best year to buy? See the full comparison on the Suzuki Rgv250 page →

About This Data

This page shows how Suzuki Rgv250 cars manufactured in 1992 perform at MOT as they age. Data spans from 2009 to 2024, covering 805 tests. Pass rates naturally decline with age as components wear.

Based on DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2005–2024). Crown copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0.

Share via WhatsApp Share on Facebook Report Issue